The first obstacle to the possibility of creating a substitute digital justice system, in which software judges replace human judges, is the anthropocentric approach of our legal system. Is this a valid objection? But first of all, is AI intelligence? Could it prove to be an antagonist to humans? And then, what kind of anthropocentrism is sustainable today? Does traditional self-referential anthropocentrism still hold up in the face of the discovery of human animality and the digital revolution in society? Analyzed in light of the AInimal Revolution, the hypothesis of a substitute digital justice raises questions that challenge the very foundations of the functioning of our judicial system and, even before that, our conception of law itself and fundamental human rights.
Keywords: Digital Law, Digital Justice, AI, Exogenous Anthropocentrism, Intelligence, Fundamental Human Rights.